NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 Just now, JTrue said: Based on last year getting 1? Not following...what does last year have anything to do with it? This is a new contract. My speculation is based on the fact that Espn is looking for all of the inventory they can get to fill espn+. The question is are they going to pay a premium to the AAC for this? I have my doubts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Calibull said: I like having ESPN+ I hate Espn+...just another bill to pay to watch USF. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,508 Reputation: 879 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/05/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 Just now, NewEnglandBull said: Not following...what does last year have anything to do with it? This is a new contract. My speculation is based on the fact that Espn is looking for all of the inventory they can get to fill espn+. The question is are they going to pay a premium to the AAC for this? I have my doubts. I'm not sure if you can use the word 'fact' with this statement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Admin Topic Count: 13,332 Content Count: 96,986 Reputation: 10,806 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, NewEnglandBull said: The question is are they going to pay a premium to the AAC for this? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, NewEnglandBull said: Not following...what does last year have anything to do with it? This is a new contract. My speculation is based on the fact that Espn is looking for all of the inventory they can get to fill espn+. The question is are they going to pay a premium to the AAC for this? I have my doubts. My question is, based on us getting a reported 3x more per year, you've decided that also means 3/4 of our games won't be on TV because we had 1 last year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,508 Reputation: 879 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/05/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 Just now, NewEnglandBull said: I hate Espn+...just another bill to pay to watch USF. I didn't ask you that... I like it and that's really all that matters to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 Just now, Calibull said: I'm not sure if you can use the word 'fact' with this statement No? I am pretty confortable with it relative to the program quality the channel has now. The college football conferences are a whose who of irrelevancy and we could be grouped in there with them. ESPN is losing millions on the venture right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Calibull said: I didn't ask you that... I like it and that's really all that matters to me. Well you could have said that to yourself without posting it. If it’s posted it’s open for another opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, JTrue said: My question is, based on us getting a reported 3x more per year, you've decided that also means 3/4 of our games won't be on TV because we had 1 last year? No, I am not making a correlation between the number of games we had on last year and what we would get in a new contract. I AM saying if ESPN pays us they will put us on espn+ around 5 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, NewEnglandBull said: Well you could have said that to yourself without posting it. If it’s posted it’s open for another opinion. Much like declaring we should be getting more than $7 million with nothing to back it up other than what you've seen people post online that we might be getting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now