NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, JTrue said: Considering we get about $2 million a year right now, what makes you think anything less than $7 million is a bad deal? I don't follow this at all, but why are you confident we'd get 3x+ more on the open market next year? Word from many who have been following (like CAustin Cox) since Nov, were saying $8 mil per team. That number has been repeated enough that it’s developed into the benchmark. His last tweet was for tier 1 only so I suspect if that was the case the number is probably $5 mil (educated guess). Edited February 20, 2019 by NewEnglandBull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, NewEnglandBull said: Word from many who have been following (like CAustin Cox) since Nov, were saying $8 mil per team. That number has been repeated enough that it’s develooed into the benchmark. His last number was for tier 1 only so I suspect if that was the case the number is probably $5 mil (educated guess). So we more than double our money? What about your statement that we'd have 3/4 of our games on ESPN+ after only having 1 last year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted February 20, 2019 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 582 Content Count: 22,676 Reputation: 5,813 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted February 20, 2019 This thread rocks. The first post says "no details available" yet we have people that know the details. Priceless. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, JTrue said: So we more than double our money? What about your statement that we'd have 3/4 of our games on ESPN+ after only having 1 last year? We had no games on Espn+ last year...we had one (as usual) on ESPN3. To be on ESpn+ At $5mil is a total failure...doubling $1 to $2 is weak relative to the tv numbers the bigger games drew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,508 Reputation: 879 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/05/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 I'm wait and see... but we'll get more money so that's always good. It's crazy people are prematurely trashing it without knowing anything at all about it... except some conjecture which is likely off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, CousinRicky said: This thread rocks. The first post says "no details available" yet we have people that know the details. Priceless. Speculation on a discussion board...shocking development... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 Just now, NewEnglandBull said: We had no games on Espn+ last year...we had one (as usual) on ESPN3. To be on ESpn+ At $5mil is a total failure...doubling $1 to $2 is weak relative to the tv numbers the bigger games drew. So we had one online only game last year and you jumped to 9? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, JTrue said: So we had one online only game last year and you jumped to 9? 3/4 of the conference games. Yes that could be us at 9 if we suck but probably Tulane, ECU will come closer to that number. But I could see up to 5 to 6 of our games on the channel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, NewEnglandBull said: 3/4 of the conference games. Yes that could be us at 9 if we suck but probably Tulane, ECU will come closer to that number. But I could see up to 5 to 6 of our games on the channel. Based on last year getting 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibull Posted February 20, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,508 Reputation: 879 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/05/2011 Share Posted February 20, 2019 I like having ESPN+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now