Hope you all like watching USF football on ESPN+

[NewEnglandBull]

 

[JTrue]

I’m fine with it.

[TakeItOrLeavitt]

I have no faith in anything Aresco does. Hopefully ESPN was feeling generous.

[NewEnglandBull]

31 minutes ago, JTrue said:

I’m fine with it.

It sucks ass. The telecast will freeze in the middle of a play like ESPN3 and let’s face it the only people watching will be fans from both schools. The AAC is about to become even more irrelevant...

Edited February 20, 2019 by NewEnglandBull

[puc86]

Power 6 football baby, whoo!!!

[NewEnglandBull]

1 minute ago, puc86 said:

Power 6 football baby, whoo!!!

After we are on espn+ it will be more like power8 football...whoho! 

[Brad]

49 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

Hope you all like watching USF football on ESPN+

 

10 minutes ago, puc86 said:

Power 6 football baby, whoo!!!

@puc86, is this good for UCF?  Asking for a friend.

[JTrue]

9 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

It sucks ass. The telecast will freeze in the middle of a play like ESPN3 and let’s face it the only people watching will be fans from both schools. The AAC is about to become even more irrelevant...

Do you really believe that if we were on ESPNU Week 5 at 8pm with USC v Washington, Stanford v Washington State, UCLA v Arizona, etc. that the casual fan would be like, "Whoa... SMU is at USF tonight, hold the phone! I sure do hope this is on regular TV and not the internet!"

[NewEnglandBull]

3 minutes ago, JTrue said:

Do you really believe that if we were on ESPNU Week 5 at 8pm with USC v Washington, Stanford v Washington State, UCLA v Arizona, etc. that the casual fan would be like, "Whoa... SMU is at USF tonight, hold the phone! I sure do hope this is on regular TV and not the internet!"

But JTrue let’s face it if our games are on line it sends a message that we are not good enough to be on the regular espn networks. Regardless of ones belief about wireless, it’s still second class with fewer viewers...we would not even be in the back of the bus we would be on a tricycle eating fumes. 

Edited February 20, 2019 by NewEnglandBull

[JTrue]

1 minute ago, NewEnglandBull said:

But Brad let’s face it if our games are on line it sends a message that we are not good enough to be on the regular espn networks. Regardless of ones belief about wireless, it’s still second class with fewer viewers...we would not even be in the back of the bus we would be on a tricycle eating fumes. 

So you'd rather us take half the money and be on CBS where half our fans don't even get the channel?