Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Bulls at SMU - In Game Chat (ESPNU)


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  257
  • Content Count:  2,403
  • Reputation:   162
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  03/24/2008

19 minutes ago, Mike Stuben said:

How many of us wish we could replay the Citadel and Georgetown games? I would bet we would win both of them if we played them again right now. (in particular with Yetna healthy)

how about Tulsa and Cinci and Temple too

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  74
  • Content Count:  2,457
  • Reputation:   1,130
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  04/08/2012

1 minute ago, bcgruber said:

how about Tulsa and Cinci and Temple too

Right, but I picked the two the furthest back, because we are so much better of a team today than we were at the beginning of the season. 

Think about it, 5 of our 6 losses could all have changed on 1 shot. (of course, we have wins that are close too)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,332
  • Content Count:  96,987
  • Reputation:   10,808
  • Days Won:  469
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

4 hours ago, NewEnglandBull said:

Correct which they were...11-0 run my friend. I never said “blew it” which would be final. Why is this hard for you to comprehend? If you are questioning my thinking that I did not believe we still had a chance then you must have missed my 1,000 comments on the fortitude and guts of this team...

I’m just trying to figure out why you called out @Brad in the disavowal of your previous “blowing it” comment.  Now you’re challenging my comprehension.   Kind of aggrsssive and angry at me when I can’t figure out what the hell I have to do with either of your comments.   

  • Upvote 1
  • Me no likey 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  12
  • Content Count:  1,485
  • Reputation:   543
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/24/2013

I don't hold it against him for abandoning the dumpster fire at the time, but with McMurray's scoring ability, I think we'd be a step ahead where we are now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  12
  • Content Count:  1,485
  • Reputation:   543
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/24/2013

1 minute ago, Brad said:

I’m just trying to figure out why you called out @Brad in the disavowal of your previous “blowing it” comment.  Now you’re challenging my comprehension.   Kind of aggrsssive and angry at me when I can’t figure out what the hell I have to do with either of your comments.   

They just really like you and don't want you to feel left out.

  • ???? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,332
  • Content Count:  96,987
  • Reputation:   10,808
  • Days Won:  469
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

That must be it.  MikeG, too I suppose.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

6 minutes ago, Brad said:

I’m just trying to figure out why you called out @Brad in the disavowal of your previous “blowing it” comment.  Now you’re challenging my comprehension.   Kind of aggrsssive and angry at me when I can’t figure out what the hell I have to do with either of your comments.   

Brad, I was responding to the down vote that you gave. I thought it was unnecessary based on my comment I was trying to explain why. Sorry if that was not clear and sorry if you thought it was overly aggressive...that was not my intention. 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  76
  • Content Count:  6,712
  • Reputation:   1,131
  • Days Won:  17
  • Joined:  09/07/2009

58 minutes ago, bullstampede9922 said:

I don't hold it against him for abandoning the dumpster fire at the time, but with McMurray's scoring ability, I think we'd be a step ahead where we are now.

Nope. That guy is a defensive liability. He wouldn't fit in this system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,332
  • Content Count:  96,987
  • Reputation:   10,808
  • Days Won:  469
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

56 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

Brad, I was responding to the down vote that you gave. I thought it was unnecessary based on my comment I was trying to explain why. Sorry if that was not clear and sorry if you thought it was overly aggressive...that was not my intention. 

Oh, the downvote....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  12
  • Content Count:  1,485
  • Reputation:   543
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/24/2013

33 minutes ago, George Jenkins said:

Nope. That guy is a defensive liability. He wouldn't fit in this system. 

Even coming off the bench,  I think he'd contribute more than Lang or Brown have.   Defensive liability is a little harsh.  I'm not saying I want him back, just saying if he had never left, he would have been a nice additional scoring option.  He seems to be doing fine starting for SMU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.