USF Recruiting? Yeah, pretty good...

[Azmodi]

1 minute ago, JTrue said:

Depending on your recruiting service of choice, he's already brought in a couple 4 stars in the past two classes. So I don't understand what your beef is.

My BEEF is, I was making a comment about the class as a whole. It was an off the cuff comment about the fact that our HC flip flopped on the type of players he wanted and the strength of the class as well as previously recalled assurances that CCS would recruit better. Then people started complaining about my posting, you included. 

 

My only error was that the comments previously made weren't as positive and matter of fact as I had thought they were. I do apologize for my error there.

[Azmodi]

9 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

He hates CCS...that's his beef...

I do no hate CCS. You have some issues with reading comprehension. 

I like CCS as a person (As much as I know of him), I'm not overly fond of his flip flop on the players and tossing them under the bus (which I believe he did). I hope he can right the ship on offense and stop all the silly penalties on both sides of the ball. I also think he will be good for USF if he can get things strait. I am not however convinced he's a good X's and O's  Coach. Honestly, he doesn't need to be great at X's and O's as long and his OC and DC are. He just needs to be a great Manager.

[George_Bullnard_Shaw]

6 hours ago, zarnozdabull said:

START ALL OF THEM.

Lose about 6-9 games and then win nonstop ala UCiF.

I'd rather go 0-5 then 7-0 than our 7-0, 0-5 order.

[zarnozdabull]

Some of you really crack me up.

Being upset that we have the highest ranked class in the country in our level of play .

[Gismo]

2 hours ago, zarnozdabull said:

Some of you really crack me up.

Being upset that we have the highest ranked class in the country in our level of play .

Even higher than some P5 teams! 

[USF Bulls Football]

5th in the AAC...

[JTrue]

1 minute ago, USF Bulls Football said:

5th in the AAC...

We got crushed by the top 4 this year. It's pretty embarrassing, actually.

[chapelbull]

and Houston making a late push

[BrassBulls12]

There is a lot about 247's rankings that I don't understand. Like how is ECU higher than us when we have two more three stars than them and a higher average. We have more three star recruits than SMU and the same amount of commits overall. They have a .22 average advantage and that equates to a 8 point difference? Just doesn't make any sense. 

[JTrue]

16 minutes ago, BrassBulls12 said:

There is a lot about 247's rankings that I don't understand. Like how is ECU higher than us when we have two more three stars than them and a higher average. We have more three star recruits than SMU and the same amount of commits overall. They have a .22 average advantage and that equates to a 8 point difference? Just doesn't make any sense. 

They have some sort of formula that takes into account both the number of recruits AND the quality of those recruits. You can kind of figure out the gist of it if you play with the recruit calculator and add/subtract people from the list to see what the overall impact is.