Execution is not an excuse

[Wildrover]

it was bad but this is more a problem of alignment.  Alignment of a group of players and their particular set of skills with the coaching staff leading them.  In this case there is very poor alignment between the offensive staff and the offensive players.  How do you take a Heisemen candidate and an offense routinely scoring putting over 40 on anybody and reduce them to this? 

This is because you have an offensive staff so committed to their philosophy that they can't work around the skills of the players they have.  I'm astounded and super pleased with the turnaround on defense but with the players we have on offense, it shouldn't have been a fair trade

$0.02

[GaUSFBull]

Bro, slow down on all the threads. Usually people create one to air all grievances. 

And by my count, you're well over two cents deposited.  You are easily pushing a dime at this point.

[Gismo]

Well, for 4th and 24.... I would peg that on the players.

 

But, the coaches could have coached a better game so it wouldn't have come to that.

Edited October 29, 2017 by Gismo

[NCBull]

2 minutes ago, Gismo said:

Well, for 4th and 24.... I would peg that on the players.

 

But, the coaches could have coached a better game so it wouldn't have come to that.

Fair enough

[Wildrover]

8 minutes ago, GaUSFBull said:

Bro, slow down on all the threads. Usually people create one to air all grievances. 

And by my count, you're well over two cents deposited.  You are easily pushing a dime at this point.

I'm not your brother and if there is a rule or edict that I'm breaking by starting multi threads then please fill me in.  I apologize.  having said that,  assuming this isn't a rule and I'm just breaking your own preconceived formality,  I'll just say that brevity isn't my thing (kudos who get the big lebowski reference) so it just seems more strategic if I want people to read my thoughts to break them up.  You know, much like a long email vs several shorter ones.  Societie's short attention span and all

just my $0.02

[GaUSFBull]

1 minute ago, Wildrover said:

I'm not your brother 

Ah.  A millennial.  Sorry, should have used the term "brah."

But then you quoted Lebowski, so maybe not.  

Carry on with the cathartis.  Sorry to get in the middle of it.

[JTrue]

22 minutes ago, Wildrover said:

I'm not your brother and if there is a rule or edict that I'm breaking by starting multi threads then please fill me in.  I apologize.  having said that,  assuming this isn't a rule and I'm just breaking your own preconceived formality,  I'll just say that brevity isn't my thing (kudos who get the big lebowski reference) so it just seems more strategic if I want people to read my thoughts to break them up.  You know, much like a long email vs several shorter ones.  Societie's short attention span and all

just my $0.02

Do you type $0.02 each time? Is it a signature? 

[NewEnglandBull]

10 minutes ago, JTrue said:

Do you type $0.02 each time? Is it a signature? 

It will cost you to find out...

$0.02

[Brad]

Careful. Bulls Country does not need another civil war.  

[GaUSFBull]

27 minutes ago, JTrue said:

Do you type $0.02 each time? Is it a signature? 

 

16 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

It will cost you to find out...

$0.02

 Maybe at some point he'll discover the appropriate smiley.