Dogma Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 303 Content Count: 5,550 Reputation: 866 Days Won: 21 Joined: 11/07/2009 Posted February 3, 2016 1
Ionbull Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,610 Reputation: 635 Days Won: 3 Joined: 12/17/2015 Posted February 3, 2016 Clearly worked with flying colors against the spread offenses of the American, like Tom Allen wanted. We have he playmakers to make it happen and it's the system the guys all bought into. Think it's great for the personnel and looking forward to seeing what CRW can do with it. Curious if Jancek has any experience with it though.
usfbullrider Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 3,223 Reputation: 388 Days Won: 8 Joined: 07/30/2011 Posted February 3, 2016 I think Tramal Ivy at Bull position is going to be scary. Think D.Hill at 2x speed. I hope we do prepare a 4-3 defense if we play navy again though.
adphill2 Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 63 Reputation: 21 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/12/2015 Posted February 3, 2016 I think this makes since with our speed. I'd like to have the option to switch to 4-3 in clear running situations but 4-2-5 makes since with the recruits we have access to and the talent we've been able to get at DB.
BDYZR Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 504 Content Count: 12,968 Reputation: 3,197 Days Won: 25 Joined: 12/14/2005 Posted February 4, 2016 16 hours ago, usfbullrider said: I think Tramal Ivy at Bull position is going to be scary. Think D.Hill at 2x speed. I hope we do prepare a 4-3 defense if we play navy again though. Agree. At least stack the box and try forcing them to throw. BTW - the Husky will be called Stinger in the new 4-2-5.
Bull Dozer Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 343 Content Count: 13,697 Reputation: 2,041 Days Won: 45 Joined: 09/04/2006 Posted February 4, 2016 This is great news! I think we will definitely see defensive improvement just from scheme continuity and our defense staying mostly intact personnel wise.
Apis Bull Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Posted February 4, 2016 25 minutes ago, Bull Dozer said: This is great news! I think we will definitely see defensive improvement just from scheme continuity and our defense staying mostly intact personnel wise. I agree!
nobull.Bulls Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 103 Content Count: 5,241 Reputation: 60 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/02/2007 Posted February 4, 2016 17 hours ago, adphill2 said: I think this makes since with our speed. I'd like to have the option to switch to 4-3 in clear running situations but 4-2-5 makes since with the recruits we have access to and the talent we've been able to get at DB. I think the Husky/Stinger position is a hybrid Safety/Linebacker position. I don't see why another Linebacker couldn't fill in there to help with the run
Apis Bull Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Posted February 4, 2016 1 minute ago, nobull.Bulls said: I think the Husky/Stinger position is a hybrid Safety/Linebacker position. I don't see why another Linebacker couldn't fill in there to help with the run You could put it a smaller/faster LB in run situations. But I guess if he's an LB, then it's really a 4-3 and not a 4-2-5
BucsandBulls Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 13 Content Count: 314 Reputation: 77 Days Won: 1 Joined: 03/07/2006 Posted February 4, 2016 Against Navy I would really like to see us go to a single high true safety and then go to a 4-3 front and still keep the husky/striker in as well.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now