Dogma Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 303 Content Count: 5,532 Reputation: 858 Days Won: 21 Joined: 11/07/2009 Share Posted February 3, 2016 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ionbull Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,610 Reputation: 635 Days Won: 3 Joined: 12/17/2015 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Clearly worked with flying colors against the spread offenses of the American, like Tom Allen wanted. We have he playmakers to make it happen and it's the system the guys all bought into. Think it's great for the personnel and looking forward to seeing what CRW can do with it. Curious if Jancek has any experience with it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usfbullrider Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 3,204 Reputation: 376 Days Won: 8 Joined: 07/30/2011 Share Posted February 3, 2016 I think Tramal Ivy at Bull position is going to be scary. Think D.Hill at 2x speed. I hope we do prepare a 4-3 defense if we play navy again though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adphill2 Posted February 3, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 63 Reputation: 21 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/12/2015 Share Posted February 3, 2016 I think this makes since with our speed. I'd like to have the option to switch to 4-3 in clear running situations but 4-2-5 makes since with the recruits we have access to and the talent we've been able to get at DB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDYZR Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 446 Content Count: 10,872 Reputation: 2,055 Days Won: 23 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted February 4, 2016 16 hours ago, usfbullrider said: I think Tramal Ivy at Bull position is going to be scary. Think D.Hill at 2x speed. I hope we do prepare a 4-3 defense if we play navy again though. Agree. At least stack the box and try forcing them to throw. BTW - the Husky will be called Stinger in the new 4-2-5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Dozer Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 343 Content Count: 13,697 Reputation: 2,041 Days Won: 45 Joined: 09/04/2006 Share Posted February 4, 2016 This is great news! I think we will definitely see defensive improvement just from scheme continuity and our defense staying mostly intact personnel wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted February 4, 2016 25 minutes ago, Bull Dozer said: This is great news! I think we will definitely see defensive improvement just from scheme continuity and our defense staying mostly intact personnel wise. I agree! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobull.Bulls Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 103 Content Count: 5,241 Reputation: 60 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/02/2007 Share Posted February 4, 2016 17 hours ago, adphill2 said: I think this makes since with our speed. I'd like to have the option to switch to 4-3 in clear running situations but 4-2-5 makes since with the recruits we have access to and the talent we've been able to get at DB. I think the Husky/Stinger position is a hybrid Safety/Linebacker position. I don't see why another Linebacker couldn't fill in there to help with the run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apis Bull Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted February 4, 2016 1 minute ago, nobull.Bulls said: I think the Husky/Stinger position is a hybrid Safety/Linebacker position. I don't see why another Linebacker couldn't fill in there to help with the run You could put it a smaller/faster LB in run situations. But I guess if he's an LB, then it's really a 4-3 and not a 4-2-5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucsandBulls Posted February 4, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 13 Content Count: 268 Reputation: 73 Days Won: 1 Joined: 03/07/2006 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Against Navy I would really like to see us go to a single high true safety and then go to a 4-3 front and still keep the husky/striker in as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.6224c1809790f89c8c74391f5c04c6a6.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now