May not have had many viewers but we ranked #4 of all the bowls

[Sellular1]

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/eye-on-college-football/25435740/ranking-all-40-college-football-bowl-games-for-2015-16-from-worst-to-best

[Triple B]

"lack of darns given by either team" .... So what does that mean?

[Ionbull]

42 minutes ago, Triple B said:

"lack of darns given by either team" .... So what does that mean?

Lots of trick plays I presumed and offense. Or lack of effort from the refs.

[raptorcj]

"Not the closest game, but for sure zaniness and lack of darns given by either team, this one was pretty great."

Wouldn't read much thought into it TBPH. Clear lack of darns put into actual writing of the article. Now, for TBP it's okay to let it slide but a "staff writer" to use sure instead of sheer is pure "I don't even know what I'm sayin' but since it's the holidays and no one's double-checking me..."

Strange rankings to be sure though.

[Bulls On Parade]

Most of the bowls were blowouts we had a entertaining game compared to the rest.

That TCU Oregon game was the best.

[Rocky Style]

3 hours ago, Ionbull said:

Lots of trick plays I presumed and offense. Or lack of effort from the refs.

I took it to mean the crazy plays.  It was a wild game.

[MikeG]

[Fold FB Invest in BB]

Lack of darn given surely refers to our defense, right?

[BDYZR]

My give-a-darn's broken...

[Bear]

The team should have put out more effort to get the win