Jump to content

  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

P5 entry, how would it change USF Athletics?

Flowers4Heisman
 Share

Recommended Posts

NewEnglandBull Toro Magnifico

NewEnglandBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009
Posted
3 minutes ago, BullsFanInTX said:

You've bought the lie. Hook, line, and sinker. 

It is a lie that USF would need quote "many years" to compete in p5. 

Did it take many years for USF to compete in BE. Our recruiting is on par with many so called power programs. Top of AAC is better than many power programs. Navy just destroyed Pitt. A team we were leading in 4th. 

You've been fed a media lie but the jokes on you because you bought it

USF could go in and compete in year 1 with 75% of power teams with our current talent base. Mack is one of the 10 best RBs in the country, power or not. 

The jokes on me? Really? Cool your jets pal, we have had one winning season in six. Being competitive in the BE is NOT a comparison. That conference had two good teams two  mediocre teams and four turds. Please don't compare the BE to the Big12, it does not work. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

emrober5
emrober5

USF would compete just fine in a P5 conference. Every conference has bottom feeders like Indiana, Iowa State, Kentucky.  But really, we just need the money. If the AAC could get even close to P5

NewEnglandBull
NewEnglandBull

The jokes on me? Really? Cool your jets pal, we have had one winning season in six. Being competitive in the BE is NOT a comparison. That conference had two good teams two  mediocre teams and four tur

GaUSFBull
GaUSFBull
NewEnglandBull Toro Magnifico

NewEnglandBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Bear said:

After seeing attendance numbers, tv contracts, and bowl performance this last season...

 

... The AAC is mediocre G5 at best.

I would say this conference is more than "mediocre" within a G5 perspective. Compared to a P5 conference it does not compare but it can beat many of the low level P5 teams. Indeed, we are the tallest of the midgets conference wise right now.

Edited by NewEnglandBull
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sellular1 Toro Magnifico

Sellular1

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  196
  • Content Count:  6,611
  • Reputation:   1,778
  • Days Won:  51
  • Joined:  07/04/2008
Posted
20 minutes ago, BullsFanInTX said:

You've bought the lie. Hook, line, and sinker. 

It is a lie that USF would need quote "many years" to compete in p5. 

Did it take many years for USF to compete in BE. Our recruiting is on par with many so called power programs. Top of AAC is better than many power programs. Navy just destroyed Pitt. A team we were leading in 4th. 

You've been fed a media lie but the jokes on you because you bought it

USF could go in and compete in year 1 with 75% of power teams with our current talent base. Mack is one of the 10 best RBs in the country, power or not. 

TCU wandered around G5 conferences for 10+ years (WAC, CUSA, MWC) then jumped right into the B12 and was ranked one of the top 3 teams in the country and won the Big12 conf within 3 years.  They also had a winning record and a bowl game their 1st season in the B12

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sellular1 Toro Magnifico

Sellular1

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  196
  • Content Count:  6,611
  • Reputation:   1,778
  • Days Won:  51
  • Joined:  07/04/2008
Posted
17 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

The jokes on me? Really? Cool your jets pal, we have had one winning season in six. Being competitive in the BE is NOT a comparison. That conference had two good teams two  mediocre teams and four turds. Please don't compare the BE to the Big12, it does not work. 

Gotta agree that the AAC/BE is nowhere near as competitive as B12

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewEnglandBull Toro Magnifico

NewEnglandBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009
Posted
Just now, Sellular1 said:

TCU wandered around G5 conferences for 10+ years (WAC, CUSA, MWC) then jumped right into the B12 and was ranked one of the top 3 teams in the country and won the Big12 conf within 3 years.  They also had a winning record and a bowl game their 1st season in the B12

They did go to a Rose Bowl prior to being and a power five conference

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sellular1 Toro Magnifico

Sellular1

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  196
  • Content Count:  6,611
  • Reputation:   1,778
  • Days Won:  51
  • Joined:  07/04/2008
Posted
17 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

I would say this conference is more than "mediocre" within a G5 perspective. Compared to a P5 conference it does not compare but it can beat many of the low level P5 teams. Indeed, we are the tallest of the midgets conference wise right now.

The shorter midgets beat us in all our bowl games...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Triple B Toro Magnifico

Triple B

Posted
  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,609
  • Content Count:  74,460
  • Reputation:   10,772
  • Days Won:  422
  • Joined:  11/25/2005
Posted
33 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

I would say this conference is more than "mediocre" within a G5 perspective. Compared to a P5 conference it does not compare but it can beat many of the low level P5 teams. Indeed, we are the tallest of the midgets conference wise right now.

 

15 minutes ago, Sellular1 said:

The shorter midgets beat us in all our bowl games...

But they're still in the shorter midgets conferences ...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewEnglandBull Toro Magnifico

NewEnglandBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009
Posted
20 minutes ago, Sellular1 said:

The shorter midgets beat us in all our bowl games...

Which means little (get it?) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MMW Grand Bull

MMW

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  2,106
  • Reputation:   909
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  09/14/2007
Posted

I think the term is "little people"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GaUSFBull Toro Magnifico

GaUSFBull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009
Posted
50 minutes ago, mark_my_words said:

I think the term is "little people"

57134651.jpg

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.

Got it!
Dismiss