I disagree. The forward propulsion call was legit. We would have been in an uproar if Rutgers did the same thing and got away with it.
The last USF throw of the Rutgers game was a terrible call.
Forward propulsion was legit?
It was not at all. Illegal forward propulsion is when a player intentionally throws the ball to the ground in hopes someone else will pick it up. Replays clearly showed that the ball was knocked out of the USF player's hands by a Rutgers player from behind, thus pushing the ball forward. There wasn't anything remotely intentional about it. A regular fumble that is advanced is perfectly legal, which is exactly what happened in the Rutgers game.
When I take my green and gold glasses off, it looks like there was an intentional throw forward. It was a smart play, and I bet Rutgers would have gotten away with it, but I can't objectively say that it was a bad call.
I looked at that play a bunch of times. The ball was very, very clearly knocked forward by a Rutgers player that hit him from behind. It wasn't remotely close, and it would have been beyond stupid for the USF player to propel the ball forward in that situation anyway. It was far from the end of the game and it was a huge play to block the kick. No player would think about try to pass the ball forward.
I have no idea what you think you saw, but it was clearly a Rutgers player that pushed it forward.
I watched it multiple times too. It looks like forward propulsion to me. I have no idea how you can watch that play and write "it wasn't remotely close".
Agree to disagree.