Jump to content

05 Bull

Member
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 05 Bull

  1. 11 hours ago, TheUpperHand said:

    S8rVo3b.gif

    It'd be better with just the U, but with the full 'USF' it just looks off.

    Agree. Overall look not terrible, but still missing the mark. But I have been tremendously underwhelmed since switching to Adidas. Personally, i think Adidas has been mailing it in and not creative in anyway. Even the sleeves were a rip-off from UA. I miss the UA days.

    Ultimately though, i guess its only fashion so perhaps not a big deal, especially if the athletes like them.

     

    • Like 1
  2. 34 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

    There are 13 pages of ideas...I think every reasonable idea has been listed...might as well wait and see what happens at this point.

    Your opinion. Not fact. 

    And is speculation, venting, sharing, and yadayada not the majority of the lure of this forum? If I wanted to wait and see, why would i read this thread, or forum?

    And much of the 13 pages is fluff. But yes, there are some thoughtful ideas shared. In particular, thank you to Heart Attack for your contribution.

    Go Bulls!

     

  3. On 9/30/2019 at 11:26 AM, Corey lea said:

    Strong is loyal to dogs and have seen signs of the team quitting already.

    BJM should not be retained under any circumstance.

    Roberts, Atterbury and Norman will get you fired, but yet Chuck keeps these dogs in the lineup.

    For all of you that think Hampton is a NFL guy, I would say go get yourself checked out.

    Bellamy is flying around...making a few freshmen mistakes, but dang at least he is giving us some effort. 

    McCloud was just dang awful the other day and that little attitude he showed on the sideline should put him back on the bench. If your leader is a quitter then the others will follow.

    Maybe Barnett will come back and win us 7 or 8 more.

    Too my personnel questions on this team and I just think that Strong is a **** idiot to keep playing a few of the dogs. I would not hire him at the next stop under no circumstance. Enjoy all the free money at Texas and USF. 

    So.... have you officially jumped off the CCS ship?

    Join us, our numbers have grown dramatically the last 12 months. Frankly, there were many signs of his ineptness during Year 1.

  4. 3 minutes ago, Rocky Style said:

    Oh I was saying do we as fans just chill and find hobbies while we get obliterated constantly until eventually we charge up enough funds to hire an up and coming OC.

    I mis-understood. Good question. I have no good answer at this time. But personally, I dont think I can stomach watching any more games until CCS is gone. 

  5. 1 minute ago, NewEnglandBull said:

    Sorry I just don’t see this. Why go through all of this when we can make an offer to Clemson or Bama OC? It’s really not complicated. 

    If Clemson OC would be interested, hell yes! Thats Jeff Scott?

    But why would he take a USF gig when he likely is already paid as much (or very close to it) as USF could afford, and knowing a more lucrative an likely attractive P5 program will come calling any day/year? 

    I believe USF has zero chance at someone like the OC from Clemson. 

    I understand if you are differing opinion. And of course, by all means, USF should gauge the potential interest of Clemson OC. 

     

  6. 5 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

    What coach is coming here as a coach in waiting??? That only works for the blue bloods. You can keep your CJL. Give me a young hungry offensive coordinator from a big time program. 

    To clarify, the “ coach in waiting” was not meant to be contractually binding. Simply a known opportunity in the not too distant future.

    Also, no proven top-notch OC from a “big-time” program is going to come to USF as for a HC gig. If they are smart enough to be a top OC at a big-time program, they’ll bide their time an extra couple years (at an already large salary) for a desirable P5 job to open up (whether at OC or HC). The only exception would possibly be someone with deep USF or Tampa ties; but even then its unlikely.

    I’m floating the idea of someone actually interested in a future HC gig at USF. Such as a Young coordinator without enough resume to get a Coordinator position at a “big time” program, or proven coordinator at a non-“big time” program. And if he does not progress accordingly, he’s not promoted. No “promises” have to be made. Simply knowing the “opportunity” for a HC position in 5-8 years is there is enough. And if the opportunity is not enticing enough, who cares, at least CJL will be an improvement over Chuckles. And that forward momentum  buys time to figure out the next best step.

     

    and good luck finding the “next” big thing young coach with little resume. The odds will be greatly against nailing that hire. Great, a 70%+ chance we fail another 3-4 years and we get to try again. And if USF does nail that hire, he’ll be gone in 2 years time. I dont like the odds. 

     

     

     

     

  7. Strong has mishandled every single season.

    Season 1. Tamper with and change a team prime for an undefeated season.

    Season 2. Continue to alienate upperclassmen (talented and productive ones) and not seeing/addressing the Incompetence, stubbornness, and ineffectiveness of OC after Season 1.

    Season 3.  Complete sh$t storm. Cant even blame not having “his recruits” or “changed culture”. Just further evidence Chuckles is incompetent himself.

    Season 4. If Chuckles is back, I will likely take the season “off”. Hell, I’m pretty much already there for the rest of this season.

  8. On 5/31/2019 at 8:11 PM, NewEnglandBull said:

    Transfers need a 2.5 unless it is nursing (3.1). 

    Wow. Thats seems pretty low.

    I believe my aquaitance had a daughter trying to enroll as a freshman (general admission, not an athlete). I did not research it, but rather took his word for it.

    Is this (2.5 and 3.1) for scholarship athletes or general standard?

    Appreciate your knowledge in this matter.

  9. Defense was bad, but the absurd amount of offense, up-tempo 3 and outs inflates the poor defensive stats. Whereas a more “ball-control” offense would have helped hide some of the defensive warts. But hey, thats why we pay coaches a million $ a year, to creatively adjust their game plans around what specific strengths and weaknesses they can take advantage of, both of their team and the opposing team. GREAT JOB chuck and numbnuts (aka fCSG).

    • Upvote 2
  10. On 12/7/2018 at 4:01 PM, NovaBull said:

    I just posted this in another thread, but I have a solution to said problem...King and Kinnan as co-offensive coordinators.

    Let the architect of the Gulf Coast Offense pass his knowledge on to King and then in a couple of years when Kinnan is ready to retire, King will take the full reins - maybe even stepping into a higher role (HC anyone) if it goes well.

     

    I like this co-OC idea with King and Kinnan.

    Or alternatively, make King OC with Kinnan a “consultant”. 

    Whichever works logistically.

     

  11. 2 hours ago, TExpress said:

    This article states we would owe him ~$154k if he is fired which would be 20 weeks of salary at an annual base of $400k. But, if he was fired prior to the new year, would it be 20 weeks at his current salary of $100k? That would be only a little over $38k...

    If accurate... pull the **** trigger! Cut bait! And before 2019! If we (usf) pay this numbnuts $400,000 next year, we need a new AD too.

    Does Kinnan have any other GCO disciples? Hell, bring back Reaves. Or promote King (vs Gilbert I dont care if he has no playcalling experience). Anything but “D”ilbert.  The mere thought of Gilbert being here next year makes me fing nauseous.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.