Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Do you own a SMALL BUSINESS?


BDYZR

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  488
  • Content Count:  12,455
  • Reputation:   2,840
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  12/14/2005

Then remember these Florida Senators:

 

Senators Bill Galvano, Miguel Diaz de la Portilla, John Lee, Bill Montford, Garrett Richter, Jeremy Ring, David Simmons, Eleanor Sobel, and John Thrasher ALL VOTED AGAINST THE SMALL BUSINESS MAN.

 

http://tbo.com/news/politics/beer-wars-come-to-tallahassee-as-craft-brewers-fight-bill-20140421/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

Defense of the status quo. This is nothing more than mercantilism writ small.

 

Vote the bums out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,680
  • Reputation:   1,233
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

This is the most retarded regulation I have ever heard of.

All of these big business are anti-competitive and anti-capitalists. They say these regulations help businesses but all they do is creat a HUGE barrier to entry to protect the countries largest corporations.

This is the stuff that really angers and irritates me.

A business being forced to sell to certain parties is total ********. Every business should be able to sell direct if they wish.

The government is requiring a completely unneccessary, inefficient and costly middleman in the most blatantly corrupt way possible. This helps the middle man and the big man, but the little guy is ****** because he can't afford to invest in a politician.

Edited by Gismo
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,680
  • Reputation:   1,233
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

Defense of the status quo. This is nothing more than mercantilism writ small.

Vote the bums out!

And herein lies the problem of the two party system. If you vote for the single opponent that has enough support to possibly win, they're just as corrupt and maybe even worse. It's become impossible to replace bad reps with good ones because the good ones are kept out by the establishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

 

Defense of the status quo. This is nothing more than mercantilism writ small.

Vote the bums out!

And herein lies the problem of the two party system. If you vote for the single opponent that has enough support to possibly win, they're just as corrupt and maybe even worse. It's become impossible to replace bad reps with good ones because the good ones are kept out by the establishment.

 

 

Not really. They're kept out by voter apathy. We're averaging, what, 28% turnout?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,680
  • Reputation:   1,233
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

Defense of the status quo. This is nothing more than mercantilism writ small.

Vote the bums out!

And herein lies the problem of the two party system. If you vote for the single opponent that has enough support to possibly win, they're just as corrupt and maybe even worse. It's become impossible to replace bad reps with good ones because the good ones are kept out by the establishment.

Not really. They're kept out by voter apathy. We're averaging, what, 28% turnout?
They are kept out by keeping them from having access to money. Campaigns are won and lost by advertising. Few people are in a position to fund their own campaign.

A 3rd party campaign has to battle the establishment and the media and big business who do everything in their power to keep the outsiders out.

The parties are able to make primary votes meaningless because not everyone has access to the primaries and as private organizations, even for those registered woth voting access, the party can change the rules at anytime and just pick the establishment guy.

Edited by Gismo
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

If the voters cared, the 72% could elect anyone they durned well pleased...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,680
  • Reputation:   1,233
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

If the voters cared, the 72% could elect anyone they durned well pleased...

Those 72% are in bliss, why vote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  83
  • Content Count:  1,720
  • Reputation:   207
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  02/11/2011

The GOP say they support small businesses but they only care about big businesses that fund their campaigns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  417
  • Content Count:  9,680
  • Reputation:   1,233
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  09/24/2009

The GOP say they support small businesses but they only care about big businesses that fund their campaigns.

This is true for both parties. See GE and recent Comcast merger.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.