Gilbert Rumors

[JTrue]

10 minutes ago, Triple B said:

I think if you told people that we'd average a couple more total yards on offense per game ... including 23 more yards passing, with 2 more yards per catch ... they would have been ecstatic. Critics keep harping on the hb dives that didn't work, ignoring those that did, along with the myriad of other plays that must have worked also to get those numbers. The one gripe I can kind of agree with is not using Q enough in the red zone, which is probably reflected in the 6 points less per game average. Bottom line is that Gilbert's offense didn't stop us from getting where we wanted to this year and next year it's a whole new process with replacing the starting backfield.

So, a guy who spent 3 years with QF and helped develop him, worked out the offense with him, and essentially created it with him in mind knew a little better how to deploy him than a guy who had less than a year? Weird.

[Skingraft]

I just scrolled through 4 pages of arguing 😂🤣😂🤣

[USFBULL_08]

2 hours ago, JupiterBull said:

The topic isn't about USF firing him.  It's about rumors that LSU may be trying to poach him.  The drop off in performance this year is seen as mostly his doing (losing Mack & Adams clearly hurt, too).  It's hard to argue that he didn't dull the offense and make try a little of Taggart did upon arrival...try to jam his preferred offense, talent notwithstanding.

But, maybe that's why I'm not a college football coach, and Gilbert is.

maybe i made it confusing but i didnt think USF was firing him. It was my opinion if he got hired away

The playcalling was dull, whether that was him or directed by Strong. I think pretty much any spread coordinator could have done a similar job.

 

[Triple B]

11 minutes ago, JTrue said:

So, a guy who spent 3 years with QF and helped develop him, worked out the offense with him, and essentially created it with him in mind knew a little better how to deploy him than a guy who had less than a year? Weird.

Don't think you needed to see QF for 3 years to figure out the dimension he could give you near the goal line. That was a critique I agreed with.

[Bulls On Parade]

9 hours ago, Skingraft said:

I just scrolled through 4 pages of arguing 😂🤣😂🤣

We call that a Sunday 😊

[Dogma]

10 hours ago, Skingraft said:

I just scrolled through 4 pages of arguing 😂🤣😂🤣

No you didn't! 

[George_Bullnard_Shaw]

10 hours ago, Skingraft said:

I just scrolled through 4 pages of arguing 😂🤣😂🤣

 

3 minutes ago, Dogma said:

No you didn't! 

This isn't an argument, it's a contradiction!

[Dogma]

1 hour ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said:

 

This isn't an argument, it's a contradiction!

Can be both.  And sometimes how arguments start. 

They don't have to be mutually exclusive. 

[George_Bullnard_Shaw]

1 minute ago, Dogma said:

Can be both.  And sometimes how arguments start. 

They don't have to be mutually exclusive. 

No. If you paid for an argument you don't want a contradiction.

M: An argument isn't just contradiction.

O: Well! it CAN be!

M: No it can't!

M: An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.

O: No it isn't!

M: Yes it is! 'tisn't just contradiction.

O: Look, if I *argue* with you, I must take up a contrary position!

M: Yes but it isn't just saying 'no it isn't'.

O: Yes it is!

M: No it isn't!

O: Yes it is!

M: No it isn't!

O: Yes it is!

M: No it ISN'T! Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.

O: It is NOT!

M: It is!

O: Not at all!

M: It is!

[Triple B]

1 hour ago, George_Bullnard_Shaw said:

This isn't an argument, it's a contradiction!

No it isn't.

 

Edit: Nevermind. I see you posted it.

Edited January 8, 2018 by Triple B