Apis Bull Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted December 29, 2017 25 minutes ago, jasonb56 said: Just heard that Bowl viewership is up 12% for the first 20 bowls. That is some healthy growth right there... Maybe because attendance is down. They're all home watching on TV instead of going to the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodi Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 12 Content Count: 3,233 Reputation: 1,169 Days Won: 8 Joined: 10/17/2013 Share Posted December 29, 2017 (edited) Can someone please explain to me why in week 13; they have the Pitt-Miami game with a higher rating then the USF-UCF, game even though the USF-UCF game drew a larger audience. Edited December 29, 2017 by Azmodi punctuation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonb56 Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 347 Content Count: 1,867 Reputation: 202 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/13/2003 Share Posted December 29, 2017 16 minutes ago, Apis Bull said: Maybe because attendance is down. They're all home watching on TV instead of going to the games. ESPN is ok with that, keep pushing those advertising rates up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsfan1983 Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 4 Content Count: 839 Reputation: 125 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/17/2013 Share Posted December 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, Azmodi said: Can someone please explain to me why in week 13; they have the Pitt-Miami game with a higher rating then the USF-UCF, game even though the USF-UCF game drew a larger audience. The rating is more like share of the market. different time slots have different number of total television viewers. More people watching tv as the day progresses particularly accounting for the west coast and 3 hour time difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodi Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 12 Content Count: 3,233 Reputation: 1,169 Days Won: 8 Joined: 10/17/2013 Share Posted December 29, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, bullsfan1983 said: The rating is more like share of the market. different time slots have different number of total television viewers. More people watching tv as the day progresses particularly accounting for the west coast and 3 hour time difference. That would be fine but you have it in reverse. The Pitt-Miami game was at the Noon slot and we were at the 3:30pm slot which has a larger viewing audience. So you're saying they have a larger share of a smaller audience. right? Edited December 29, 2017 by Azmodi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mama_Bull Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,207 Content Count: 18,470 Reputation: 899 Days Won: 44 Joined: 10/14/2003 Author Share Posted December 29, 2017 The Birmingham bowl did very well: The Texas Tech-USF Birmingham Bowl had a 2.15 and 3.4 million (+47%), its largest audience since 2014. http://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2017/12/bowl-ratings-starting-pick-steam/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 hour ago, Mama_Bull said: The Birmingham bowl did very well: The Texas Tech-USF Birmingham Bowl had a 2.15 and 3.4 million (+47%), its largest audience since 2014. http://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2017/12/bowl-ratings-starting-pick-steam/ Sweet! We may not have the butts in seats for home games, but we've pulling some decent ratings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 hour ago, Mama_Bull said: The Birmingham bowl did very well: The Texas Tech-USF Birmingham Bowl had a 2.15 and 3.4 million (+47%), its largest audience since 2014. http://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2017/12/bowl-ratings-starting-pick-steam/ Probably helped we we were the only game on at noon on a Saturday. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmanbull93 Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 3 Content Count: 213 Reputation: 47 Days Won: 1 Joined: 12/03/2014 Share Posted December 29, 2017 (edited) 56 minutes ago, GaUSFBull said: Probably helped we we were the only game on at noon on a Saturday. ^^^^^^this....gamblers had to play and watch SOMETHING and we were the only game in town Edited December 29, 2017 by gmanbull93 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted December 29, 2017 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,610 Content Count: 74,509 Reputation: 10,798 Days Won: 422 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted December 29, 2017 5 hours ago, Azmodi said: Can someone please explain to me why in week 13; they have the Pitt-Miami game with a higher rating then the USF-UCF, game even though the USF-UCF game drew a larger audience. Adjustment for P5 viewers vs G5 viewers ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now