Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,207
  • Content Count:  18,470
  • Reputation:   899
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/14/2003

I hope the sports media gets more on board with the AAC being justly considered a P6 conference.

I think that is starting to happen, but the AAC needs to keep proving itself, on the field, by putting more distance away from the others.

RealTimeRPI makes it pretty clear:

 

NCAA Men's Football - Conference Rankings (2017-2018)

Only games against Division I opponents are counted. 
Rankings update every 5 mins. 
Last updated - Mon Sep 18 11:10:23 PDT 2017 
 
    NCAAF Team Rankings     NCAAF Team Standings     NCAAF Gamer Predictions 
Rank Conference (Teams) All Non-Conf Index Sos Sos Rk
    1   Pacific-12 12  28-9 (76%)  26-7 (79%)  29.26  53.35 4
    2   Southeastern 14  30-10 (75%)  26-6 (81%)  28.88  54.50 2
    3   Big Ten 14  30-9 (77%)  29-8 (78%)  28.52  53.13 6
    4   Atlantic Coast 14  25-12 (68%)  22-9 (71%)  28.07  55.51 1
    5   Big 12 10  19-10 (66%)  19-10 (66%)  26.76  52.55 7
    6   American Athletic 12  19-11 (63%)  18-10 (64%)  23.05  53.76 3
    7   Mountain West 12  16-20 (44%)  15-19 (44%)  19.76  51.88 8
    8   Mid-American 12  18-17 (51%)  18-17 (51%)  19.10  50.24 10
Up 1 From Last Week +1 9   Conference USA 14  18-22 (45%)  16-20 (44%)  18.50  50.15 11
Down 1 From Last Week -1 10   Independents 4  5-9 (36%)  5-9 (36%)  18.15  53.31 5

    11   Sun Belt 12  11-20 (35%)  9-18 (33%)  16.49  50.10 12
    fcs 12   Missouri Valley 10  18-8 (69%)  18-8 (69%)  12.70  45.22 21
    fcs 13   Colonial 12  23-13 (64%)  21-11 (66%)  11.16  47.03 17
    fcs 14   Southern 9  8-14 (36%)  5-11 (31%)  10.46  51.19 9
Up 1 From Last Week +1 fcs 15   Big Sky 13  11-22 (33%)  9-20 (31%)  8.89  49.56 13
Down 1 From Last Week -1 fcs 16   Big South 5  7-7 (50%)  7-7 (50%)  8.67  46.99 18
Up 2 From Last Week +2 fcs 17   Southland 11  10-18 (36%)  6-14 (30%)  7.53  40.65 23
    fcs 18   Ohio Valley 9  7-16 (30%)  7-16 (30%)  7.32  44.74 22
Down 2 From Last Week -2 fcs 19   Patriot League 7  6-14 (30%)  5-13 (28%)  6.80  47.09 16
Up 3 From Last WeekUp 3 From Last Week +3 fcs 20   Ivy League 8  5-2 (71%)  5-2 (71%)  6.79  36.76 24

Down 1 From Last Week -1 fcs 21   Mid-Eastern Athletic 11  6-19 (24%)  5-18 (22%)  6.53  46.80 19
Down 1 From Last Week -1 fcs 22   Northeast 7  7-11 (39%)  6-10 (38%)  6.12  46.26 20
Down 1 From Last Week -1 fcs 23   Southwestern Athletic 10  3-20 (13%)  2-19 (10%)  5.79  48.61 15
    fcs 24   Pioneer League 11  3-19 (14%)  2-18 (10%)  5.25  49.44 14

2016-2017 ratings     NCAAF Team Rankings     NCAAB Power Ratings     NCAAF Predictions 

 

http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/ncaaf_conf_Men.html

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  365
  • Content Count:  6,466
  • Reputation:   1,893
  • Days Won:  35
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

We have essentially returned to where we were at the time the Big East collapsed. We are way better than the other conferences and slightly behind most of the P5. I think right now we are just as good as the Big 12, but I think there will be a BIG push to contract down to P4 rather than to expand to P6. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

Instead of divvying up the TV funds by conference, we should do all TV contracts through the NCAA, and get to some sort of parity.

Each team/ conference can keep all their licensing/ ticket/ concession sales, but the TV $ should be targetted at parity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,207
  • Content Count:  18,470
  • Reputation:   899
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/14/2003

9 minutes ago, BullyPulpit said:

We have essentially returned to where we were at the time the Big East collapsed. We are way better than the other conferences and slightly behind most of the P5. I think right now we are just as good as the Big 12, but I think there will be a BIG push to contract down to P4 rather than to expand to P6. 

Well, the idea of ultimately having four top conferences with 16 teams each might happen some day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  4,729
  • Content Count:  37,554
  • Reputation:   2,298
  • Days Won:  29
  • Joined:  12/24/2001

Keep Winning !

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  365
  • Content Count:  6,466
  • Reputation:   1,893
  • Days Won:  35
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

8 minutes ago, charsibb said:

Instead of divvying up the TV funds by conference, we should do all TV contracts through the NCAA, and get to some sort of parity.

Each team/ conference can keep all their licensing/ ticket/ concession sales, but the TV $ should be targetted at parity.

Agreed, but it will never happen. IMO, we are going to ultimately see four 16 team conferences. If we were really lucky, it would be four 18 team conferences. That is the scenario where a team like USF would be likely to have a spot at the table. It is also a very workable scenario in which each team could play the 8 other teams in their division and then have 4 OOC games each season, creating a true conference championship match-up for each of the 4 conferences. That would be considered the first round of the playoffs (8 divisional winners). Then, those 4 conference champions would continue on to the same 4 team format that is currently in place. I expect the 4 conference arrangement to be in place by 2025-2026. The expiration of the Big 12's TV contract just so happens to coincide with the expiration of ESPNs 12 year contract for the rights to televise the CFP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  2,106
  • Reputation:   909
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

40 minutes ago, BullyPulpit said:

We have essentially returned to where we were at the time the Big East collapsed. We are way better than the other conferences and slightly behind most of the P5. I think right now we are just as good as the Big 12, but I think there will be a BIG push to contract down to P4 rather than to expand to P6. 

We are one of the more attractive teams the best league not in the P5. 

We just need to keep winning.  With CCS recruiting and our weak schedule we should remain so for the foreseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  300
  • Content Count:  7,993
  • Reputation:   968
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  10/31/2005

42 minutes ago, charsibb said:

Instead of divvying up the TV funds by conference, we should do all TV contracts through the NCAA, and get to some sort of parity.

Each team/ conference can keep all their licensing/ ticket/ concession sales, but the TV $ should be targetted at parity.

That would be an antitrust violation. 

"NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts. These antitrust laws were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_v._Board_of_Regents_of_the_University_of_Oklahoma

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

13 minutes ago, SANJAY said:

That would be an antitrust violation. 

"NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts. These antitrust laws were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_v._Board_of_Regents_of_the_University_of_Oklahoma

No worries. MLB and NFL both got exemptions. NCAAF could get one too

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  300
  • Content Count:  7,993
  • Reputation:   968
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  10/31/2005

42 minutes ago, charsibb said:

No worries. MLB and NFL both got exemptions. NCAAF could get one too

The big teams don't want to obtain such an exemption. They've had 33 years since the Supreme Court decided that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tell a friend

    Love TheBullsPen.com? Tell a friend!
  • South Florida Fight Song

     

  • Quotes

    “In my mind, I’m kind of like, ‘OK, excuses over'. We know what we need to do. We’ve got the right team together, and now we move forward, and we’ll evaluate and be accountable to each other, including myself, from this point forward.”

    Michael Kelly  

  • Files

  • Recent Achievements

  • Popular Contributors

  • Quotes

    "He is a young and extremely gifted offensive mind, a developer of high-level talent and an elite national recruiter who brings the experience of having played an integral role from the beginning in helping to build one of the most successful programs in college football."

    - Michael Kelly on Jeff Scott  

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.