Apis Bull Posted April 3, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,586 Content Count: 23,185 Reputation: 2,332 Days Won: 65 Joined: 09/05/2002 Share Posted April 3, 2017 By all accounts, BJ wanted to be more of a pocket passer and CSH wanted him to be more of one also. There is nothing out there that indicated that either of them, "forced" the situation. There is an article out there (I'm too lazy to look it up again) that CSH wanted BJ to operate out of the pocket and if the first or second read weren't there, then take off. Regardless, it's a moot point as neither are here anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMW Posted April 3, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 39 Content Count: 2,109 Reputation: 909 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted April 3, 2017 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Apis Bull said: By all accounts, BJ wanted to be more of a pocket passer and CSH wanted him to be more of one also. There is nothing out there that indicated that either of them, "forced" the situation. There is an article out there (I'm too lazy to look it up again) that CSH wanted BJ to operate out of the pocket and if the first or second read weren't there, then take off. Regardless, it's a moot point as neither are here anymore. Wait a minute, I for one, do not feel that this subject has been properly explored. Nothing can be more relevant to our future success than resolving this controversial issue. Are we sure that CSH was not actively trying to sabotage BJ in order to play Eveld? Maybe BJ's duel threat capabilities were hampered by his cagey adoption of steel toed shoes. Moves and counter moves...moves and counter moves. Edited April 3, 2017 by MMW 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Dozer Posted April 3, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 343 Content Count: 13,697 Reputation: 2,041 Days Won: 45 Joined: 09/04/2006 Share Posted April 3, 2017 11 minutes ago, MMW said: Wait a minute, I for one, do not feel that this subject has been properly explored. Nothing can be more relevant to our future success than resolving this controversial issue. Are we sure that CSH was not actively trying to sabotage BJ in order to play Eveld? Maybe BJ's duel threat capabilities were hampered by his cagey adoption of steel toed shoes. Moves and counter moves...moves and counter moves. As long as people keep trying to throw BJ under the bus the defend Holtz this topic will be active. There's a segment on the board that must try to defend Holtz at all cost and make it seem like he never did anything wrong in his tenure here and another that pretty much makes Holtz out to be a terrible football coach (even though there's tons of non USF coaching to prove otherwise) who can do no right. Dude was 2 coaches ago and his tenure at USF was undeniably bad. It is what it is and it's time to move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted April 3, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted April 3, 2017 Infinitely more important, Todd Fitch is the OC at LA Tech. My entire view of the universe was shattered when I read that. His offense here vs. what LA Tech put up last year would be like Chris Cosh being the DC at Alabama last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted April 3, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted April 3, 2017 5 hours ago, Apis Bull said: By all accounts, BJ wanted to be more of a pocket passer and CSH wanted him to be more of one also. There is nothing out there that indicated that either of them, "forced" the situation. There is an article out there (I'm too lazy to look it up again) that CSH wanted BJ to operate out of the pocket and if the first or second read weren't there, then take off. Regardless, it's a moot point as neither are here anymore. 4 hours ago, MMW said: Wait a minute, I for one, do not feel that this subject has been properly explored. Nothing can be more relevant to our future success than resolving this controversial issue. Are we sure that CSH was not actively trying to sabotage BJ in order to play Eveld? Maybe BJ's duel threat capabilities were hampered by his cagey adoption of steel toed shoes. Moves and counter moves...moves and counter moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fold FB Invest in BB Posted April 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 76 Content Count: 6,712 Reputation: 1,131 Days Won: 17 Joined: 09/07/2009 Share Posted April 4, 2017 22 hours ago, Apis Bull said: By all accounts, BJ wanted to be more of a pocket passer and CSH wanted him to be more of one also. There is nothing out there that indicated that either of them, "forced" the situation. There is an article out there (I'm too lazy to look it up again) that CSH wanted BJ to operate out of the pocket and if the first or second read weren't there, then take off. Regardless, it's a moot point as neither are here anymore. What pocket? Until recently, we've never really had a pocket for our QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fold FB Invest in BB Posted April 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 76 Content Count: 6,712 Reputation: 1,131 Days Won: 17 Joined: 09/07/2009 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Eveld beat Miami tho... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now