charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Correct. Notice that I never said no to the $25m but you did so no to the peanuts. The world is built, one peanut at a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Oh, and BTW, we BOTH need to get a life, LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Can we please just drop Tulane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsbucsfan426 Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 129 Content Count: 3,114 Reputation: 471 Days Won: 7 Joined: 11/28/2010 Share Posted March 23, 2017 I think if Navy became an all-sports member a lot more people would visit Annapolis for games, and vice versa. Football is great, but it's not for everyone, and having some big name opponents to play will help Navy get better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ionbull Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 8 Content Count: 2,610 Reputation: 635 Days Won: 3 Joined: 12/17/2015 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Is Navy banging down the door to bring all sports to the AAC? If so we have a discussion; if they don't, then the conference needs to move forward with expansion in a new way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
79 Bull Posted March 23, 2017 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 682 Content Count: 7,629 Reputation: 1,188 Days Won: 6 Joined: 07/10/2003 Share Posted March 23, 2017 I know we don't want to create the debacle that was the Big East, but I think it would make sense for Wichita to join as non-football and then add Air Force and Army as football only. That would create a higher profile conference with 14 football schools and 12 olympic sports schools. Hopefully, the TV money and revenues would increase given that conference and footprint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Stuben Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 74 Content Count: 2,457 Reputation: 1,130 Days Won: 19 Joined: 04/08/2012 Share Posted March 23, 2017 3 hours ago, NewEnglandBull said: Can we please just drop Tulane. Wait a moment ... not so fast ..... What Tulane lacks in athletic competitiveness they make up for in city "charms" ...... I've been waiting 21 years for a football roadie to New Orleans, don't take that from me. (and we need a rivalry series with UNLV too) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 1 hour ago, 79 Bull said: I know we don't want to create the debacle that was the Big East, but I think it would make sense for Wichita to join as non-football and then add Air Force and Army as football only. That would create a higher profile conference with 14 football schools and 12 olympic sports schools. Hopefully, the TV money and revenues would increase given that conference and footprint. The problem for the AAC in adding Army is that the Army-Navy game is a week AFTER the Conference Championship Game. I don't think Army will ever be added as a football member. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 152 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 5 minutes ago, charsibb said: The problem for the AAC in adding Army is that the Army-Navy game is a week AFTER the Conference Championship Game. I don't think Army will ever be added as a football member. Why not? They bring a national audience and a degree of personal and professional respect for their students that none of our current or future members could ever bring. Not to mention the increased alumni support they would immediately bring to the entire conference. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted March 23, 2017 9 minutes ago, JTrue said: Why not? They bring a national audience and a degree of personal and professional respect for their students that none of our current or future members could ever bring. Not to mention the increased alumni support they would immediately bring to the entire conference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now