Skingraft Posted March 3, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 743 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted March 3, 2017 http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2017/3/2/14796202/2017-nfl-combine-results-running-backs-leonard-fournette-dalvin-cook-christian-mccaffrey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2000bull Posted March 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 83 Content Count: 7,037 Reputation: 633 Days Won: 11 Joined: 06/04/2009 Share Posted March 4, 2017 Pitts RB is really short Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted March 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted March 4, 2017 1 hour ago, 2000bull said: Pitts RB is really short That's not a bad thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted March 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted March 4, 2017 very respectable numbers! Looks like a pretty good combine as far as the stats, but that field is definitely deep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-Hornz Posted March 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 78 Content Count: 1,978 Reputation: 333 Days Won: 7 Joined: 04/19/2007 Share Posted March 4, 2017 He did good. I never would have guessed Mack was 3 lbs heavier than D. Cook or that Cook would run the 40 faster. I most likely would have switched those two stats. Mack is just about in that elite category with Cook. Maybe one more year and he could have been even better as far as the combine is concerned. But now he gets paid to become better. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2000bull Posted March 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 83 Content Count: 7,037 Reputation: 633 Days Won: 11 Joined: 06/04/2009 Share Posted March 4, 2017 8 hours ago, NewEnglandBull said: That's not a bad thing He's listed on that site as 3'-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted March 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted March 4, 2017 43 minutes ago, 2000bull said: He's listed on that site as 3'-1 Uhh..ok...that is kind of bad thing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great 8 Posted March 4, 2017 Group: Member Topic Count: 69 Content Count: 3,802 Reputation: 372 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/21/2009 Share Posted March 4, 2017 I might be a homer but his stats look better than his elite peers as far as I can tell. Some guys have .02 seconds on him but he wins in weight and jumps. Or, some guys have more weight and he kills them in speed. Awesome numbers from what I can judge. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now