Jump to content

IBulleve

Member
  • Posts

    1,215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

IBulleve last won the day on March 10 2017

IBulleve had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

IBulleve's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

383

Reputation

  1. Appreciate the response, but I refuse to have that conversation right now lol
  2. There’s no shortage of opportunities to poke holes in the net system (no pun intended). I genuinely don’t understand how we are below some of these teams. Look at St. Bonaventure for an example. Q1: 0-4 (USF 1-0) Q2: 2-2 (USF 5-3) Q3: 8-2 (USF 8-0) Q4: 8-2 (USF 9-2) How do you operate an entire sport on a made up “NET” system, and the the meat and potatoes of it contradict itself in the rankings? How in the year 2024 have we somehow made a WORSE BCS system?
  3. Not to expedite the offseason talk, but am I understanding this correctly that we only expect to lose 3 players this offseason - Selton, Placer and Hines?
  4. Someone needs to give Brandon Stroud the red light. Kid can’t shoot lol
  5. I’m very aware. Pounding the table that analytics are important, useful, and even critical to a functioning sports organization today isn’t the conversation we’re having. We’re discussing whether or not to blindly use %’s in game theory. I’m very pro-analytics, especially when it comes to roster construction in baseball. But game theory isn’t a perfect science, especially not at the lower collegiate level where there’s more variables than the pro game. Example - a lot of these generic game theory models would tell you to go for it on 4th and 1 whether you’re facing Navy or the New England Patriots. Surely we can agree there’s matchups and factors that need to be considered in these potential different circumstances, correct? Thus, why you don’t blindly trust the numbers note: I say “lower” in terms of a relatively bad football team that doesn’t execute at the level of a professional team.
  6. Using a baseball teams approach to justify your opinion on football game theory is a wild take lol.
  7. This is the correct take. Blindly following the analytics is just as bad as blindly opposing them. They’re a tool that should be used accordingly
  8. If he is, we need to make the move. Byrum simply isn’t ready for this type of game
  9. Not at least throwing the ball there on 4th down is an inexcusable mistake by a QB at this level
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.